The U.N. decision to pull out troops from Rwanda is a sign of a lackThis is particularly so when account is taken of the fact that the
of sufficient concern for an African tragic situation.
, Salim added.I am also disheartened by the U.N. decision to abandon the people of
Salim's statement added to criticism from African diplomats at what
they see as a double standard in reducing U.N. forces in Rwanda and
bolstering U.N. involvement in the former Yugoslavia.
The Security Council voted unanimously on Thursday to cut its
peacekeeping force in Rwanda to a bare minimum of 270. The U.N.
Assistance Mission in Rwanda strength was 2,500 before fighting erupted
on April 6.
The council pledged to consider promptly any recommendations to
increase the force and mandate, depending on developments.
Salim said the U.N. decision was particularly disheartening as it was
made when the OAU and African states were pushing to halt massacres and
secure a ceasefire in Rwanda to end the crisis which was triggered by
the killing of the Rwandan president.
he
said.
He said the U.N. troop cut disregarded persistent appeals by relief and
humanitarian agencies for increased U.N. involvement to ensure the
continued delivery of humanitarian assistance to Rwandans.
(c) Reuters Limited 1994
fgtquery v.1.9, 9 février 2024